Restricted access

Research article

First published online November 14, 2018

Request permissions

Do regional party primaries affect the ideological cohesion of political parties in multilevel systems? Evidence from Spain

Marc Debus https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7151-7942 [email protected] and Rosa M NavarreteView all authors and affiliations

Volume 26, Issue 6

https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812200

Abstract
References
Biographies
Supplementary Material

Abstract

Parties have strong incentives to present a relatively cohesive policy position to the voters across different levels of a political system. However, the adoption of inclusive forms of candidate selection methods like primaries could result in the selection of top candidates for elections on the subnational sphere who are not favoured by the party leadership. This is often seen as a threat to high levels of intra-party programmatic cohesion. Because subnational party organizations depend to a significant degree on the support from their national party, we argue that regional party branches that selected their top candidates by means of a primary adopt a policy position that deviates less strongly from the one of their national party. However, candidates selected by primaries might need to be responsive to the preferences of their regional selectorate, so that the incentives for parties at a regional level to deviate substantially from the position of their national party organization could increase. By analysing the content of 150 regional election manifestos of Spanish parties, we find that if a party’s top candidate for a regional election is selected in a primary, then the policy distance between the respective regional and national party decreases. However, this effect is not observable for recently founded parties.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Adams JF, Ezrow L, Somer-Topcu Z (2011) Is anybody listening? Evidence that voters do not respond to European parties’ policy statements during elections. American Journal of Political Science 55(2): 370–382.

Armingeon K, Guthmann K (2014) Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research 53(3): 423–442.

Aylott N, Bolin N (2016) Towards a framework for analysing party leadership selection. Centre for European Research Working Paper Series 2016: 9. Available at: http://cergu.gu.se/digitalAssets/1564/1564112_wp-2016.9-aylott-and-bolin.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2017).

Bakker R, de Vries C, Edwards E, et al. (2015) Measuring party positions in Europe: the Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics 21(1): 143–152.

Bardi L, Bartolini S, Trechsel A (2014) Party adaptation and change and the crisis of democracy. Party Politics 20(2): 151–159.

Baumann M, Debus M, Klingelhöfer T (2017) Keeping one’s seat: the competitiveness of MP renomination in mixed-member electoral systems. The Journal of Politics 79(3): 979–994.

Bawn K, Cohen M, Karol D, et al. (2012) A theory of political parties: groups, policy demands and nominations in American politics. Perspectives on Politics 10(3): 571–597.

Benoit K, Laver MJ (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.

Bille L (2001) Democratizing a democratic procedure: Myth or reality? Candidate selection in Western European parties, 1960–1990. Party politics 7(3): 363–380.

Brady DW, Han H, Pope JC (2007) Primary elections and candidate ideology: Out of step with the primary electorate? Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(1): 79–105.

Brambor T, Clark WR, Golder M (2006) Understanding interaction models: improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis 14(1): 63–82.

Bräuninger T, Debus M, Müller J (2013) Estimating Policy Positions of Political Actors Across Countries and Time. MZES Working Paper 153. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.

Borz G, Janda K (2020) Contemporary trends in party organization: Revisiting intra-party democracy. Party Politics 26(1): 3–8.

Cabeza L, Gómez B, Alonso S (2017) How national parties nationalize regional elections: the case of Spain. The Journal of Federalism 47(1): 77–98.

Carey JM (2007) Competing principals, political institutions, and party unity in legislative voting. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92–107.

Chiru M, Gauja A, Gherghina S, et al. (2015) Explaining change in party leadership selection rules. In: Cross WP, Pilet JB (eds) The Politics of Party Leadership: A Cross National Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 31–49.

Cordero G, Coller X (2018) Democratizing Candidate Selection New Methods, Old Receipts? London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Cordero G, Jaime-Castillo AM, Coller X (2016) Candidate selection in a multilevel state: the case of Spain. American Behavioral Scientist 60(7): 853–868.

Cross W, Blais A (2012) Who selects the party leader? Party Politics 18(2): 127–150.

Cross WP, Rahat G, Kenig O, et al. (2016). The Promise and Challenge of Party Primary Elections: A Comparative Perspective. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

Detterbeck K (2012) Multi-Level Party Politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Detterbeck K (2013). The rare event of choice: party primaries in German land parties. German Politics 22(3): 270–287.

Fabre E (2011) Measuring party organization: the vertical dimension of the multi-level organization of state-wide parties in Spain and the UK. Party Politics 17(3): 343–363.

Fabre E, Swenden W (2013) Territorial politics and the state-wide party. Regional Studies 47(3): 342–355.

Gallagher M, Marsh M (1988). Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: Sage.

Giger N, Debus M, Müller J (2011) The importance of the regional context for the programmatic Position of Swiss Cantonal Parties. Swiss Political Science Review 17(3): 259–285.

Greene Z, Haber M (2015). The consequences of appearing divided: an analysis of party evaluations and vote choice. Electoral Studies 37(1): 15–27.

Hall AB (2015) What happens when extremists win primaries? American Political Science Review 109(1): 18–42.

Hall AB, Snyder JM Jr (2015) Candidate ideology and electoral success. Working paper. Available at: http://www.andrewbenjaminhall.com/Hall_Snyder_Ideology.pdf (accessed on 20 June 2018).

Hassell HJG (2015) Party control of party primaries: party influence in nominations for the US senate. The Journal of Politics 1(1):75–87.

Hazan RY, Rahat G (2010). Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Herzog A, Benoit K (2015). The most unkindest cuts: speaker selection and expressed government dissent during economic crisis. The Journal of Politics 77(4): 1157–1175.

Hill SJ, Tausanovitch C (2018). Southern realignment, party sorting, and the polarization of American primary electorates, 1958–2012. Public Choice 176(1-2): 107–132.

Hopkin J (2001) Bringing the members back in? Democratizing candidate selection in Britain and Spain. Party Politics 7(3): 343–361.

Hooghe L, Marks G, Schakel AH, et al. (2016) Measuring Regional Authority. Volume I: A Postfunctionalist Theory of Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ignazi P (2020) The four knights of intra-party democracy: A rescue for party delegitimation. Party Politics 26(1): 9–20.

Indridason IH, Kristinsson GH (2015) Primary consequences: the effects of candidate selection through party primaries in Iceland. Party Politics 21(4): 565–576.

Katz RS, Mair P (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: the emergence of the Cartel party. Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.

Klemmensen R, Hobolt SB, Hansen ME (2007) Estimating policy positions using political texts: an evaluation of the Wordscores approach. Electoral Studies 26(4): 746–755.

Klingelhöfer T (2016) Ensuring consistency across levels? The delegation model of multi-level party politics and Spanish framework manifestos. Party Politics 22(4): 452–464.

Laver M, Benoit K, Garry J (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review 97(2): 311–331.

Lazarus J (2005) Unintended consequences: anticipation of general election outcomes and primary election divisiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(3): 435–461.

León S (2012) How do citizens attribute responsibility in multilevel states? Learning, biases and asymmetric federalism. Evidence from Spain. Electoral Studies 31(1): 120–130.

León S (2014) How does decentralization affect electoral competition of state-wide parties? Evidence from Spain. Party Politics 20(3): 391–402.

Mair P, Mudde C (1998) The party family and its study. Annual Review of Political Science 1(1): 211–229.

Martin LW, Vanberg G (2008) A robust transformation procedure for interpreting political text. Political Analysis 16(1): 93–100.

May JD (1973) Opinion structure of political parties: the special law of curvilinear disparity. Political Studies 21(2): 135–151.

Mitchell MN (2012) Interpreting and Visualizing Regression Models Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

Müller J (2009) The impact of the socio-economic context on the Länder parties’ policy positions. German Politics 18(3): 365–384.

Müller J (2013) On a short leash? Sub-national party positions between regional context and national party unity. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion & Parties 23(2): 177–199.

Müller WC (2000). Political parties in parliamentary democracies: making delegation and accountability work. European Journal of Political Research 37(3): 309–333.

Orriols L, Cordero G (2016) The breakdown of the Spanish two-party system: the upsurge of Podemos and Ciudadanos in the 2015 general election. South European Society and Politics 21(4): 469–492.

Pilet JB, Cross W (eds) (2014) The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. Oxford: Routledge.

Poguntke T (2002) Party organisational linkage: Parties without firm social roots? In: Luther KR, Müller-Rommel F (eds) Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–62.

Poguntke T, Scarrow SE, Webb PD, et al. (2016) Party rules, party resources and the politics of parliamentary democracies: How parties organize in the 21st century. Party Politics 22(4): 661–678.

Quinn T (2004) Electing the leader: The British labour party’s electoral college. The British Journal of Politics & International Relations 6(3): 333–352.

Ramiro L (2016) Effects of party primaries on electoral performance: the Spanish Socialist primaries in local elections. Party Politics 22(1): 125–136.

Rodon T, Hierro MJ (2016) Podemos and Ciudadanos shake up the Spanish party system: the 2015 local and regional elections. South European Society and Politics 21(3): 339–357.

Rohrschneider R, Whitefield S (2012) The Strain of Representation: How Parties Represent Diverse Voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sandri G, Seddone A, Venturino APF (eds) (2015) Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Farnham: Ashgate.

Smith DM, Tsutsumi H (2016) Candidate selection methods and policy cohesion in parties: the impact of open recruitment in Japan. Party Politics 22(3): 339–353.

Spies DC, Kaiser A (2014) Does the mode of candidate selection affect the representativeness of parties? Party Politics 20(4): 576–590.

Stegmüller D (2013) How many countries for multilevel modeling? A comparison of frequentist and Bayesian approaches. American Journal of Political Science 57(3): 748–761.

Strøm K, Müller WC (1999) Political parties and hard choices. In: Müller WC, Strøm K (eds) Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–35.

Vall-Prat P, Rodon T (2017) Decentralisation and regional cabinet size: the Spanish case (1979–2015). West European Politics 40(4): 717–740.

Van Biezen I, Mair P, Poguntke T (2012) Going, going,…gone? The decline of party membership in contemporary Europe. European Journal of Political Research 51(1): 24–56.

Van Houten P (2009) Multi-level relations in political parties: a delegation approach. Party Politics 15(2): 137–156.

Volkens A, Bara J, Budge I, et al. (2013) Mapping Policy Preferences from Texts: Statistical Solutions for Manifesto Analysts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ward H, Ezrow L, Dorussen H (2011) Globalization, party positions, and the median voter. World Politics 63(3): 509–547.

Biographies

Marc Debus is a professor of Comparative Government at the School of Social Sciences at the University of Mannheim, Germany. His research interests include political institutions and their effects on the political process, party competition and coalition politics and political decision-making in multilevel systems.

Rosa M Navarrete is a PhD candidate at the Graduate School of Economic and Social Sciences (GESS) of the University of Mannheim. Her research interests include left-right ideology, electoral behaviour, political parties and attitudes towards democracy.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

sj-pdf-1-jcr-10.1177_1354068818812200.pdf
294.00 KB

supplemental_pdf.pdf
294.00 KB

View full text|Download PDF

You currently have no access to this content. Visit the access options page to authenticate.