Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online September 15, 2014

Bicameralism, intra-party bargaining, and the formation of party policy positions: Evidence from the German federal system

Abstract

How do political parties arrive at their policy positions? We conceptualize position formation in federalist countries as an intra-party bargaining process in which subnational parties compete with each other in an attempt to get their own positions into their national party manifesto. Drawing on theories about inter-party bargaining over ministerial portfolios, we hypothesize that the bargaining success of subnational parties depends on their parliamentary strength. We evaluate our hypotheses based on a comprehensive dataset on policy positions of national and subnational parties in Germany from 1990 until 2009. Our results show that German subnational parties that are powerful in the second parliamentary chamber (Bundesrat) are particularly successful in shaping the manifesto of their national party. The findings have important implications for our understanding of intra-party politics and position formation within political parties in Germany more specifically and federalist countries more generally.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Adams J, Clark M, Ezrow L, et al. (2004) Understanding change and stability in party ideologies: Do parties respond to public opinion or to past election results? British Journal of Political Science 34 (4): 589–610.
Amat F, Falcó-Gimeno A (2013) The legislative dynamics of political decentralization in parliamentary democracies. Comparative Political Studies. DOI: 10.1177/0010414013488550.
Bäck H, Debus M, Dumont P (2011) Who gets what in coalition governments? Predictors of portfolio allocation in parliamentary democracies. European Journal of Political Research 50 (4): 441–478.
Bäck H, Debus M, Müller J, et al. (2013) Subnational government formation in varying multilevel contexts: A comparison of eight European countries. Regional Studies 47(3): 368–387.
Benoit K, Laver M (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
Bräuninger T, Debus M (2008) Der Einfluss von Koalitionsaussagen, programmatischen Standpunkten und der Bundespolitik auf die Regierungsbildung in den deutschen Ländern. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 49 ( 2): 309–338.
Bräuninger T, Debus M (2012) Parteienwettbewerb in den deutschen Bundesländern. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Bräuninger T, König T (1999) The checks and balances of party federalism: German federal government in a divided legislature. European Journal of Political Research 36 (2):453–469.
Bräuninger T, Debus M, Müller J (2013) Estimating Policy Positions of Political Actors Across Countries and Time. Mannheim [Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung: Arbeitspapiere; 153]. Available at: http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/d7/en/publications/report/estimating-policy-positions-of-political-actors-across-countries-and-time.
Budge I, Laver M (1993) The policy basis of government coalitions: A comparative investigation. British Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 499–519.
Budge I, Klingemann H-D, Volkens A, et al. (2001) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments 1945–1998. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Costello R, Thomson R (2008) Election pledges and their enactment in coalition governments: A comparative analysis of Ireland. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Policy 18 (3): 239–256.
Cunning G (2009) Inference by eye: Reading the overlap of independent confidence intervals. Statistics in Medicine 28(2): 205–220.
Däubler T (2012) The preparation and use of election manifestos: Learning from the Irish case. Irish Political Studies 27 (1): 51–70.
Detterbeck K (2012) Multi-Level Party Politics in Western Europe. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Dolezal M, Ennser-Jedenastik L, Müller WC, et al. (2012) The life cycle of party manifestos: The Austrian case. West European Politics 35 (4): 869–895.
Downs A (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
Druckman JN, Martin LW, Thies MF (2005) Influence without confidence: Upper chambers and government formation. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (4): 529–648.
Druckman JN, Thies MF (2002) The importance of concurrence: The impact of bicameralism on government formation and duration. American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 760–771.
Ennser-Jedenastik L (2013) Portfolio allocation within parties: The role of subnational party branches. Journal of Legislative Studies 19(3): 309–327.
Ezrow L (2007) The variance matters: How party systems represent the preferences of voters. Journal of Politics 69 (1): 182–192.
Falcó-Gimeno A (2014) Portfolio allocation under decentralization. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 44(1): 205–225.
Gamson WA (1961) A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review 26 (3): 373–382.
Giger N, Müller J, Debus M (2011) Die Bedeutung des subnationalen Kontexts für die programmatische Positionierung von Schweizer Kantonalparteien. Swiss Political Science Review 17 (3): 259–285.
Heller WB (2002) Subnational parties and national politics in Europe: Spain’s estado de las autonomías, 1993 to 2000. Comparative Political Studies 35 (6): 657–685.
Hennl A (2014) Intra-party dynamics in mixed-member electoral systems: How strategies of candidate selection impact parliamentary behaviour. Journal of Theoretical Politics 26 (1): 93–116.
Hooghe L, Marks GW, Schakel A (2010) The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 Countries. London, New York: Routledge.
King G, Tomz M, Wittenberg J (2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 341–355.
Klingelhöfer T, Müller J (2013) Consociational and rational coalitions: Norm-based government formation and the case of the Dutch provinces. Acta Politica. DOI: 10.1057/ap.2013.36.
Klingemann H-D, Volkens A, Bara J, et al. (eds) (2006) Mapping Policy Preferences: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Klüver H, Rodon T (2013) Explaining policy position choice of Europarties: The effect of legislative resources. British Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 629–650.
Klüver H, Spoon J-J (forthcoming) Bringing salience back in: Explaining voting defection in the European Parliament. Party Politics. DOI: 10.1177/1354068813487114.
König T (2001) Bicameralism and party politics in Germany: An empirical social choice analysis. Political Studies 49 (3): 411–437.
Kropp S (2001) Regieren in Koalitionen: Handlungsmuster und Entscheidungsbildung in deutschen Länderregierungen. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Kropp S (2010) Kooperativer Föderalismus und Politikverflechtung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Laver M, Hunt WB (1992) Policy and Party Competition. London: Routledge.
Laver M, Benoit K, Garry J (2003) Extracting policy positions from political texts using word as data. American Political Science Review 97 (2): 311–331.
Manow P, Burkhart S (2007) Legislative self-restraint, under divided government in Germany, 1976–2002. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32 (2): 167–191.
Mershon C (2001) Contending models of portfolio allocation and office payoffs to party factions: Italy, 1963–79. American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 277–293.
Miller WE, Stokes DE (1963) Constituency influence in Congress. American Political Science Review 57 (1): 45–56.
Müller J (2009) The impact of the socio-economic context on the Länder parties’ policy positions. German Politics 18 (3): 365–384.
Müller J (2013) On a short leash? Sub-national party positions between subnational context and national party unity. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 23 (2): 177–199.
Pappi FU, Becker A, Herzog A (2005) Regierungsbildung in Mehrebenensystemen. Zur Erklärung der Koalitionsbildung in den deutschen Bundesländern. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 46 (4): 432–458.
Schermann K, Ennser-Jedenastik L (2012) Explaining coalition-bargaining outcomes: Evidence from Austria, 2002–2008. Party Politics. DOI: 10.1177/1354068812453373.
Schmidt MG (2007) Das politische System Deutschlands. Institutionen, Willensbildung und Politikfelder. Bonn: Beck.
Slapin JB, Proksch S-O (2008) A scaling model for estimating time-series policy positions from texts. American Journal of Political Science 52 (3): 705–722.
Stecker C (2013) How effects on party unity vary across votes. Party Politics. Published online, DOI: 10.1177/1354068813509514.
Strøm K, Müller WC (1999) Political parties and hard choices. In: Müller WC, Strøm K (eds) Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–35.
Thomson R (2001) The programme to policy linkage: The fulfillment of election pledges on socio-economic policy in the Netherlands 1986–1998. European Journal of Political Research 40 (2): 171–197.
Thorlakson L (2009) Patterns of party integration, influence and autonomy in seven federations. Party Politics 15 (2): 157–177.
Thorlakson L (2013) Measuring vertical integration in parties with multi-level systems data. Party Politics 19 (5): 713–734.
VanDusky-Allen J, Heller WB (2014) Bicameralism and the logic of party organization. Comparative Political Studies 47 (5): 715–742.
Warwick PV (2001) Coalition policy in parliamentary democracies: Who gets how much and why. Comparative Political Studies 34 (10): 1212–1236.
Zittel T, Gschwend T (2008) Individualised constituency campaigns in mixed-member electoral systems: Candidates in the 2005 German elections. West European Politics 31 (5): 879–1003.

Biographies

Hanna Bäck is an Associate Professor at the Department of Political Science at Lund University, Sweden. Her research focuses mainly on political parties and coalition politics in Western European parliamentary democracies, focusing on topics such as parliamentary speeches, coalition formation, portfolio allocation, and policy-making. She has published articles in for example European Journal of Political Research, European Union Politics, Party Politics, Political Science Research and Methods, Public Choice, and West European Politics.
Marc Debus is a Professor of Comparative Government at the University of Mannheim, Germany. His research interests include political institutions and their effects on the political process, party competition and coalition politics, and political decision-making in multi-level systems. His articles have appeared in Political Science Research and Methods, European Journal of Political Research, Politics and Gender, Electoral Studies, Political Research Quarterly, and West European Politics, amongst others.
Heike Klüver is a Professor of Empirical Political Science at the University of Bamberg. Her research interests include European politics, interest groups, political parties, coalition governments and political representation. Heike Klüver has published her work in, amongst others, the British Journal of Political Science, European Union Politics, West European Politics, Electoral Studies and at Oxford University Press.