Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published July 13, 2007

The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation

Abstract

Quotas have become an important mechanism through which women today are entering legislatures worldwide. This study shows that the introduction of quotas has helped overcome constraints on women's representation posed by economic underdevelopment, cultural influences, and even electoral systems. This study also demonstrates that the introduction of quotas offers the most explanatory power for women's representation today, together with electoral systems that allow for greater candidate turnover (i.e., party-list proportional representation systems). The majority of studies explaining women's legislative representation prior to 2000 focused on electoral systems, cultural considerations, and the strength of leftist political parties. Since the mid-1990s, however, an increasing number of countries have introduced gender quotas, which this article incorporates into older models in cross-national multivariate analysis.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

1.
1. The 25 countries are Belarus, Bulgaria, Lithuania, Republic of Moldova, Croatia, Latvia, Poland, the F.Y.R. of Macedonia, Estonia, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Czech Republic, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovakia, Turkmenistan, Slovenia, Kazakhstan, Russian Federation, Georgia, Hungary, Serbia and Montenegro, Albania, Armenia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan.
2.
2. At the time of writing, two governments use a system where a selected authority appoints or nominates women to the national parliament. We set aside this kind of affirmative action.
3.
3. The logit transformation is natural log(Rep2006/1-Rep2006). See Reuveny and Li (2003). We assign countries with no women in parliament with having 1% of women in parliament. Otherwise, they would be excluded from the data set.
4.
4. Where parties run as part of coalitions, we report gender quotas for parties if their coalition is the top one or two coalitions. Information on whether the political party is a “major” or “minor” party is from IPU (2006). In some countries, political parties may receive some funds if a female party member is elected. Systematic data collection has yet to be conducted on this; therefore, we do not count this as a quota, although it is a form of affirmative action for women.
5.
5. World Bank (2006). We use the natural log of GDP per capita for scaling purposes. If data are not available for 2001, we use figures from 2000.
6.
6. Compiled from The New York Times (2001) and CIA (2005).
7.
7. We do not present the results for models that test for interactive effects. Our tests indicate that quotas are not significantly more or less important across regimes types and electoral systems.

References

Baldez, L. (2006). The pros and cons of gender quota laws: What happens when you kick men out and let women in? Politics & Gender, 2(1), 102-109.
Ballington, J., & Matland, R. (2004, January). Political parties and special measures: Enhancing women's participation in electoral processes. UN Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women Expert Group Meeting, New York.
Bauer, G. (2004). “The hand that stirs the pot can also run the country”: Electing women to parliament in Namibia. Journal of Modern African Studies, 42(4), 479-509.
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., & Walsh, P. (2001). New tools in comparative political economy: The database of political institutions. World Bank Economic Review, 15(1), 165-176.
Beckwith, K. (1992). Comparative research and electoral systems: Lessons from France and Italy. Women & Politics, 12(1), 1-33.
Caul, M. (2001). Political parties and the adoption of candidate gender quotas: A cross-national analysis. Journal of Politics, 63(4), 1214-1229.
CIA. (2005). World factbook . Retrieved November 25, 2005, from http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/
Dahlerup, D. (2006). Introduction. In D. Dahlerup (Ed.), Women, quotas and politics (pp. 3-31). New York: Routledge.
Freedom House. (2005). Freedom in the world comparative rankings: 1973-2004. Retrieved December 1, 2005, from http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=15&year=2004
Htun, M., & Jones, M. (2002). Engendering the right to participate in decision-making: Electoral quotas and women's leadership in Latin America. In N. Craske & M. Molyneux (Eds.), Gender and the politics of rights and democracy in Latin America (pp. 32-56). New York: Palgrave .
Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. (2006). Global database of quotas for women . Retrieved January 9, 2006, from http://www.quotaproject.org
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2006a). Parline database. Retrieved January 8, 2006, from http://www.ipu.org/parline-e/parlinesearch.asp
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2006b). Women in national parliaments. Retrieved January 8, 2006, from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/world.htm
Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2006c). Women's suffrage. Retrieved January 8, 2006, from http://www.ipu.org/wmn-e/suffrage.htm
Jones, M.P. (1996). Increasing women's representation via gender quotas: The Argentine Ley de Cupos. Women & Politics, 16(4), 75-98.
Jones, M.P. (1998). Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women: Lessons from the Argentine provinces. Comparative Political Studies, 31(1), 3-21.
Kenworthy, L., & Malami, M. (1999). Gender inequality in political representation: A worldwide comparative analysis. Social Forces, 78(1), 235-269.
Krook, M. (2004). Gender quotas as a global phenomenon: Actors and strategies in quota adoption. European Political Science, 3(3), 59-65.
Krook, M. (2006). Gender quotas, norms, and politics. Politics & Gender, 2(1), 110-118.
Kunovich, S., & Paxton, P. (2005). Pathways to power: The role of political parties in women's national political representation. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 505-552.
Lindberg, S. (2004). Women's empowerment and democratization: The effects of electoral systems, participation, and experience in Africa. Studies in Comparative International Development, 39(1), 28-53.
Lovenduski, J., & Norris, P. (1993). Gender and party politics. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Matland, R.E. (1993). Institutional variables affecting female representation in national legislatures: The case of Norway. Journal of Politics, 55(3), 737-755.
Matland, R.E. (1998). Women's representation in national legislatures: Developed and developing countries. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23(1), 109-125.
Matland, R.E., & Studlar, D.T. (1996). The contagion of women candidates in single-member district and proportional respresentation systems: Canada and Norway. Journal of Politics, 58(3), 707-733.
Matland, R.E., & Taylor, M.M. (1997). Electoral system effects on women's representation: Theoretical arguments and evidence from Costa Rica. Comparative Political Studies, 30(2), 186-210.
Moore, G., & Shackman, G. (1996). Gender and authority: A cross-national study. Social Science Quarterly, 77, 273-288.
Nanivadekar, M. (2006). Are quotas a good idea? The Indian experience with reserved seats for women. Politics & Gender, 2(1), 119-128.
The New York Times. (2001). World almanac and book of facts. New York: World Almanac Books.
Norris, P. (1985). Women's legislative participation in Western Europe . Western European Politics, 8, 90-101.
Norris, P. (1993). Conclusions: Comparing legislative recruitment . In P. Norris & J. Lovenduski (Eds.), Gender and party politics (pp. 309-330). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Oakes, A., & Almquist, E. (1993). Women in national legislatures: A cross-national test of macrostructural gender theories. Population Research & Policy Review, 12(1), 71-81.
Paxton, P. (1997). Women in national legislatures: A cross-national analysis. Social Science Research, 26(4), 442-464.
Paxton, P., & Kunovich, S. (2003). Women's political representation: The importance of ideology. Social Forces, 82(1), 87-114.
Reuveny, R., & Li, Q. (2003). Economic openness, democracy, and income inequality: An empirical analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 36(5), 575-601.
Reynolds, A. (1999). Women in the legislatures and executives of the world: Knocking at the highest glass ceiling. World Politics, 51(4), 547-572.
Reynolds, A., Reilly, B., & Ellis, A. (2004). Annex A: The electoral systems of 213 independent countries and related territories. The new international IDEA handbook. Retrieved January 9, 2006, from http://www.idea.int/publications/esd/upload/annexes-4.pdf
Rule, W. (1987). Electoral systems, contextual factors and women's opportunity for election to parliament in 23 democracies. Western Political Quarterly, 40(3), 477-498.
Squires, J. (1996). Quotas for women: Fair representation? Parliamentary Affairs, 49(1), 71-88.
Tripp, A. (2005). Regional networking as transnational feminism: African experiences. Feminist Africa, 4. Retrieved February 2, 2006, from http://www.feministafrica.org/2level.html
United Nations Department for Policy Coordination and Sustainable Development. (n.d.). List of accredited non-governmental organizations who were represented at the Fourth World Conference on Women . Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.gdrc.org/ngo/attendee
Vengroff, R., Zsolt, N., & Fugiero, M. (2003). Electoral system and gender representation in sub-national legislatures. Political Research Quarterly, 56(2), 163-173.
World Bank. (2005). GenderStats . Retrieved January 10, 2006, from http://devdata.worldbank.org
World Values Survey Association. (2006). Online data analysis of the world values survey. Retrieved January 11, 2006, from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/